AMD recordsdata patent to automate DRAM overclocking
Why it issues: Opportunities to amplify RAM performance generally reach from the intense memory profile (XMP) remark by the manufacturer or enthusiasts with enough understanding to manually tune voltages, timings, and frequencies. Earlier this week AMD successfully filed a patent for an computerized RAM overclocking machine that looks to take care of the guesswork, trial, and error from the tuning project. The machine would give users the ability to custom-tune and take a look at overclocked memory settings at the push of a button, no headaches required.
Memory overclocking is no longer if fact be told a brand unique follow within the PC community. For years, enthusiasts bask in pushed the boundaries of their RAM beyond the rated JEDEC licensed to squeeze every descend of performance from their modules. Tuning RAM can reap gargantuan rewards in performance but requires understanding a huge diversity of settings, voltages, and frequencies. This understanding is always accompanied by lengthy bouts of steadiness discovering out.
The introduction of Intel’s XMP skills (in most cases identified as DOCP on most AMD platforms) equipped the frequent client the ability to overclock modules by changing a bios atmosphere to a pre-configured profile designed to work all the map thru a alternative of hardware configurations. But even this pre-configured overclock is no longer guaranteed and would possibly maybe maybe well require handbook intervention to assemble machine steadiness. AMD’s unique memory tuning skills looks to automate the strategy of discovering out and tweaking parameters to make sure that profile steadiness.
Per the patent, the unique skills would alter frequency and explicit RAM timings for the RAM equipment and hardware combination being passe, then take a look at and alter the settings to make sure that steadiness. The computerized steadiness tests encompass Error Correction Code (ECC) and diverse tests designed to detect bit errors. As soon as the frequency and timing-based tests are total, the machine generates the unique RAM profile the usage of the subtimings and settings explicit to that PC’s hardware.
RAM timings generally descend into one amongst several categories defined as predominant, secondary, and tertiary. Main timings are those settings generally listed on a RAM equipment’s packaging and usually encompass CAS latency (CL), RAS to CAS delay (tRCD), row precharge time (tRP), and row animated time (tRAS). Secondary timings are generally no longer listed in vendor marketing documentation but can aloof bask in a gargantuan affect in your RAM’s ability to assassinate. Tertiary timings, which are even further within the weeds, can furthermore have an effect on performance but vary greatly all the map thru diverse hardware combos.
Automated tools are generally shunned by overclocking enthusiasts attributable to a machine’s mammoth protection and in most cases likelihood-averse strategy. Which ability that, handbook tunes generally yield better performance results. These results, nonetheless, require a level of recordsdata, time, and effort that many are no longer animated to position in. The flexibility to automatically tune any RAM, irrespective of label or quality, to a explicit hardware configuration indubitably sounds shapely.
We will seemingly bask in to take care of up for AMD’s unique family of CPUs and chipsets to see accurate how far down the rabbit hole their computerized resolution goes.
Image credit: AMD Wraith Prism and RAM by Timothy Dykes